Centralized systems, which are in the hands of a few, enable the few to encroach on the freedoms of the many.
Decentralized systems protect this freedom.
Decentralization allows us to democratize systems by enabling credibly neutral internet infrastructure. Subsequently, users can trust the integrity of the entire system without relying on centralized authorities; promoting innovation, competition and ecosystem diversity; and allowing users more choice, more ownership (through self-custody of data which would also enable local computation without having to share any data) and most importantly, more freedom.
By way of example, there are fundamental differences between centralized systems and decentralized systems and between centralized finance (CeFi) and decentralized finance (DeFi). These differences justify different regulatory treatments. Different risks, different regulations.
Regulation should not seek to replicate traditional finance regulatory models – instead DeFi regulation should be highly bespoke and progressive and should take into account that:
Users self-custody their data/value (and not via centralized intermediaries);
DeFi solutions enable peer-to-peer transactions without taking the role of a traditional intermediary;
DeFi models are not, therefore equivalent or comparable to CeFi or traditional intermediated financial services activities in terms of the risks that DeFi raises;
Apps that facilitate access to or the use of DeFi protocols, and not the protocols themselves (nor the developers of such protocols), may be the appropriate hook for effectively regulating DeFi, noting that careful consideration of the characteristics of a particular App will be warranted when determining the kind of regulation (if any) that ought to apply to it; and
decentralization plays a central role in DeFi, and developers need to be able to undertake a process of decentralization in relation to their protocols (including being able to issue/broadly distribute tokens) without being subject to burdensome regulatory requirements; and
Imposing onerous and inappropriate (ctrl c + ctrl v CeFi regulations) regulatory requirements on decentralized system development teams risks undermining one of the key policy objectives financial regulation typically aims at: consumer protection.
Inappropriate regulation is likely to disincentive responsible and high-quality development of decentralized systems, as it: (i) may encourage development teams to seek to develop and deploy software on an anonymous basis, rather than operating as an identified project team with whom the public can interact in relation to the development of the protocol, reporting issues, fixing bugs, etc., (ii) may encourage development teams to conduct less testing or seek to offer less support for the protocol in the early stages following launch in order to avoid potentially being subject to onerous regulatory requirements, and (iii) finally, may encourage development teams to move out of a specific jurisdiction with such onerous laws. If regulation of decentralized systems is overly burdensome or unclear, the proliferation of decentralized system solutions is likely to be lower, forcing consumers to rely on a concentrated and interlinked group of CeFi intermediaries, and their attendant risks, to access crypto markets (it is interesting to consider, for example, the role DeFi could have played in mitigating concentration and consumer protection risks in the recent high profile failures of CeFi intermediaries such as FTX, if the regulatory environment in key global jurisdictions (such as the U.S.) had been more certain and proportionate).
Any effective regulatory regime for decentralized systems which seeks to support innovation and growth in the sector must therefore be tailored to take into account the progressive (and not immediate) process of decentralization, which is essential for the continued responsible development of decentralized systems.
Accordingly, Aztec Labs will:
continue to engage with stakeholders and advocate for innovative and decentralization-focused solutions to address legal and regulatory challenges in decentralized systems;
remain dedicated to educating policymakers about recognising progressive decentralization and safeguarding the integrity of decentralized systems and their users, protecting the freedom of self-ownership and self-custody.