Sequencers
The first gate. A change needs their signals before it can become a proposal.
How the network runs
Governance
Proposals are discussed in public, sequencers signal, tokenholders vote, and a timelock runs before anything executes.
The first gate. A change needs their signals before it can become a proposal.
How the network runsThe final say. Voting power comes from $AZTEC locked in governance, staked or not.
An open, merit-based group that reviews every improvement proposal.
Every protocol change walks the same path, in public.
An improvement proposal starts as a public discussion on GitHub. Security considerations are mandatory.
An accepted proposal becomes an upgrade payload: real onchain actions anyone can inspect.
They signal support as they propose blocks. Without a quorum of signals it goes no further.
After a review delay, voting opens to everyone with locked tokens.
A mandatory delay gives node operators time to upgrade.
Anyone can execute a passed proposal. A failed one cannot be resubmitted.
Miss any one and the proposal fails.
Enough of the total voting power has to take part for the result to count.
A clear margin in favour, not a one-vote win.
A floor on turnout, so a few large holders cannot decide alone.
Voting power comes from locked tokens.
Stake 200,000 $AZTEC or more, run the node, and vote with the stake that secures the network.
Open the staking dashboardThey run the infrastructure and, by default, may vote for you. Check their voting policy first.
How delegation worksNo rewards, no slashing, and a full vote on every proposal.
An improvement proposal is reviewed in public, turned into an onchain upgrade payload, and signalled by sequencers as they propose blocks. With enough signals it becomes a proposal, tokenholders vote, and a mandatory timelock runs before anyone can execute it. It must clear quorum, a supermajority, and a minimum participation level at once.